4.8 Article

Proapoptotic and anti proliferative potential of selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in human liver tumor cells

期刊

HEPATOLOGY
卷 36, 期 4, 页码 885-894

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2002.36125

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent studies have shown increased levels of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in a variety of human malignancies, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but so far it is unknown whether COX-2 contributes to the malignant growth and whether inhibition of COX-2 function modifies the malignant potential of liver tumors. COX-1 and COX-2 expression was determined in 4 liver tumor cell lines (Hep 3B, HuH-7, Hep G2, Sk-hep1) by Northern hybridization and Western immunoblot. The functional effects of the nonselective inhibitor sulindac sulfide and the COX-2 selective inhibitors SC-58635 and meloxicam were examined by 3(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazoliumbromide (MTT)-assays and BrdU uptake, morphology, and TUNEL analysis of apoptosis. Apoptosis regulating proteins were analyzed by Western immunoblot. COX-1 and COX-2 expression was demonstrable in all tested liver tumor cell lines. Sulindac sulfide (50 to 400 mumol/L), SC-58635 (6,25 to 400 mumol/L), and meloxicam (6.25 to 400 mumol/L) led to a significant time- and dose-dependent reduction of cell numbers of up to 80% (P < .05). At equimolar concentrations the effect was more pronounced when COX-2 was selectively blocked. COX-2 inhibition induced apoptosis and reduced tumor cell proliferation. Apoptosis after COX-2 inhibition with SC-58635 (50 mumol/L) was independent of BCL-2, BAX, and the phosphorylation status of AKT/PKB and BAD, but correlated with activation of caspase-9, caspase-3, and caspase-6. In conclusion, selective inhibition of COX-2 leads to a marked growth inhibition of human liver tumor cells, based on the induction of apoptosis and inhibition of proliferation and, thus, may offer therapeutic and preventive potential in human hepatocarcinogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据