4.7 Article

THE M-σ AND M-L RELATIONS IN GALACTIC BULGES, AND DETERMINATIONS OF THEIR INTRINSIC SCATTER

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 698, 期 1, 页码 198-221

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/198

关键词

black hole physics; galaxies: general; galaxies: nuclei; galaxies: statistics; stellar dynamics

资金

  1. NASA [NAS 5-26555]
  2. NASA/HST [GO-5999, GO-6587, GO-6633, GO-7468, GO-9107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We derive improved versions of the relations between supermassive black hole mass (MBH) and host-galaxy bulge velocity dispersion (sigma) and luminosity (L; the M-sigma and M-L relations), based on 49 M-BH measurements and 19 upper limits. Particular attention is paid to recovery of the intrinsic scatter (epsilon(0)) in both relations. We find log(M-BH/M-circle dot) = alpha + beta log(sigma/ 200 km s(-1)) with (alpha, beta, epsilon(0)) = (8.12 +/- 0.08, 4.24 +/- 0.41, 0.44 +/- 0.06) for all galaxies and (alpha, beta, epsilon(0)) = (8.23 +/- 0.08, 3.96 +/- 0.42, 0.31 +/- 0.06) for ellipticals. The results for ellipticals are consistent with previous studies, but the intrinsic scatter recovered for spirals is significantly larger. The scatter inferred reinforces the need for its consideration when calculating local black hole mass function based on the M-sigma relation, and further implies that there may be substantial selection bias in studies of the evolution of the M-sigma relation. We estimate the M-L relationship as log(M-BH/M-circle dot) = alpha + beta log(L-V/10(11) L-circle dot,L- V) of (alpha, beta, epsilon(0)) = (8.95 +/- 0.11, 1.11 +/- 0.18, 0.38 +/- 0.09); using only early-type galaxies. These results appear to be insensitive to a wide range of assumptions about the measurement errors and the distribution of intrinsic scatter. We show that culling the sample according to the resolution of the black hole's sphere of influence biases the relations to larger mean masses, larger slopes, and incorrect intrinsic residuals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据