4.5 Article

Balance and residence times of 210Pb and 210Po in surface waters of the northwestern Mediterranean Sea

期刊

CONTINENTAL SHELF RESEARCH
卷 22, 期 15, 页码 2127-2146

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0278-4343(02)00074-2

关键词

Pb-210; Po-210; Ra-226; northwestern Mediterranean; residence times; 1 degrees W-6 degrees E; 37.5-44 degrees N

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Concentrations of the naturally occurring radionuclides Pb-210 and Po-210 were determined in both the dissolved (<0.2 mum) and particulate (>0.2mum) fractions in surface waters of the northwestern Mediterranean Sea. About 4-8% of the Pb-210 activity was observed to be associated to particles, which were determined as being mostly biogenic. The Pb-210 content in the particulate fraction was generally greater than that of Pb-210, accounting for about 20% of the total activity. Total activities of Pb-210 and Po-210 were found to be in equilibrium. Ra-226 concentrations were also determined in an effort to investigate its occurrence in Mediterranean waters. Ra-226 was in excess to both Pb-210 and Po-210 with a mean concentration of 1.72+/-0.03 Bq m(-3). Steady-state balance equations of the three radionuclides permit calculation of residence times for Pb-210 and Po-210 in surface waters (0.8 and 3.0 yr, respectively). Po-210 residence times were almost one order of magnitude higher than mostly reported values. Polonium is known to manifest higher affinity and different binding mechanisms (by entering the organic cycle) to biogenic material than Pb-210. Several processes, such as Po-210 uptake by buoyant particles and recycling of organic matter in the surface layer, could lead to such long residence times of Po-210 and, therefore, of organic particles in surface waters. Larger Po-210 atmospheric fluxes than those here considered and inputs from rivers and/or fine-grained sediment resuspension could also help to explain the observation, although presumably to a lesser extent. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据