4.5 Article

Molecular rulers for calibrating phenotypic effects of telomere imbalance

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
卷 39, 期 10, 页码 734-740

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jmg.39.10.734

关键词

-

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [1 RO1 HD36715-03] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As a result of the increasing use of genome wide telomere screening, it has become evident that a significant proportion of people with idiopathic mental retardation have subtle abnormalities involving the telomeres of human chromosomes. However, during the course of these studies, there have also been telomeric imbalances identified in normal people that are not associated with any apparent phenotype. We have begun to scrutinise cases from both of these groups by determining the extent of the duplication or deletion associated with the imbalance. Five cases were examined where the telomere rearrangement resulted in trisomy for the 16p telomere. The size of the trisomic segment ranged from similar to4-7 Mb and the phenotype included mental and growth retardation, brain malformations, heart defects, cleft palate, pancreatic insufficiency, genitourinary abnormalities, and dysmorphic features. Three cases with telomeric deletions without apparent phenotypic effects were also examined, one from 10q and two from 17p. All three deletions were inherited from a phenotypically normal parent carrying the same deletion, thus without apparent phenotypic effect. The largest deletion among these cases was similar to600 kb on 17p. Similar studies are necessary for all telomeric regions to differentiate between those necessary telomeric rearrangements that are pathogenic and those that are benign variants. Towards this goal, we are developing molecular rulers that incorporate multiple clones at each telomere that span the most distal 5 Mb region. While telomere screening has enabled the identification of telomere rearrangements, the use of molecular rulers will allow better phenotype prediction and prognosis related to these findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据