4.7 Article

TRANSPORT OF LARGE-SCALE POLOIDAL FLUX IN BLACK HOLE ACCRETION

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 707, 期 1, 页码 428-445

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/428

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; MHD; relativity

资金

  1. NSF [PHY-0205155, AST-0507455]
  2. NASA [NNX09AD14G]
  3. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/G00269X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. STFC [ST/G00269X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. NASA [120353, NNX09AD14G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on a global, three-dimensional GRMHD simulation of an accretion torus embedded in a large-scale vertical magnetic field orbiting a Schwarzschild black hole. This simulation investigates how a large-scale vertical field evolves within a turbulent accretion disk and whether global magnetic field configurations suitable for launching jets and winds can develop. We find that a coronal mechanism of magnetic flux motion, which operates largely outside the disk body, dominates global flux evolution. In this mechanism, magnetic stresses driven by orbital shear create large-scale half-loops of magnetic field that stretch radially inward and then reconnect, leading to discontinuous jumps in the location of magnetic flux. In contrast, little or no flux is brought in directly by accretion within the disk itself. The coronal mechanism establishes a dipole magnetic field in the evacuated funnel around the orbital axis with a field intensity regulated by a combination of the magnetic and gas pressures in the inner disk. These results prompt a re-evaluation of previous descriptions of magnetic flux motion associated with accretion. Local pictures are undercut by the intrinsically global character of magnetic flux. Formulations in terms of an effective viscosity competing with an effective resistivity are undermined by the nonlinearity of the magnetic dynamics and the fact that the same turbulence driving mass motion (traditionally identified as viscosity) can alter magnetic topology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据