4.7 Article

The Gsα gene:: Predominant maternal origin of transcription in human thyroid gland and gonads

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 87, 期 10, 页码 4736-4740

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2002-020183

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mutations in the guanine nucleotide binding a-subunit 1 gene (GNAS1) cause Albright's hereditary osteodistrophy, and the parent of transmission determines variable phenotypic expression of the disease. This has suggested that GNAS1 maybe under tissue-specific imprinting control, although studies so far available have failed to clearly define the pattern of GNAS1 expression in humans. To establish if GNAS1 is imprinted in human endocrine tissues, we selected 14 thyroid, 10 granulosa cell, 13 pituitary (3 normal glands, 7 GH-secreting adenomas, and 3 nonfunctioning adenomas), 3 adrenal, and 11 lymphocyte samples shown to be heterozygous for a known polymorphism in exon 5. RNA from these tissues was analyzed by RT-PCR, and expression from both parental alleles was evaluated by enzymatic digestion and subsequent quantification of the resulting fragments. The parental origin of Gsalpha was assessed by evaluating neuroendocrine secretory protein 55 and extra large as-like protein transcripts, which have been shown to be monoallelically and parent-specifically expressed from the maternal and paternal allele, respectively. By this approach, the great majority of thyroid (n = 12), ovarian (n = 7), and pituitary (n = 11) samples showed an almost exclusive or significantly predominant expression of the maternal allele over the paternal one, whereas in lymphocyte and adrenal samples both alleles were equally expressed. Our results provide evidence for a predominant maternal origin of GNAS1 transcripts in different human adult endocrine tissues, particularly thyroid, ovary, and pituitary, and strongly suggest that this mechanism may play a crucial role in the determination of the phenotypic expression of Albright's hereditary osteodistrophy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据