4.0 Article

Neurological and perceptual-motor outcome at 5-6 years of age in children with neonatal encephalopathy: Relationship with neonatal brain MRI

期刊

NEUROPEDIATRICS
卷 33, 期 5, 页码 242-248

出版社

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-36737

关键词

neonatal encephalopathy; MRI; Apgar score; cognitive; motor; perceptual-motor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: The aims of this study were 1) to determine the incidence of minor neurological dysfunction and perceptual-motor difficulties in children aged 51/2 - 61/2, who had been born fullterm but presented with neonatal encephalopathy (NE) and low Apgar scores and 2) to examine the relationships between the presence/absence of these difficulties with neonatal brain MRI. Participants and Methods: Sixty-eight full-term infants with one minute Apgar scores less than or equal to 5 and neurological abnormalities during the first 48 hours after birth were included in the study. All children had a neonatal MRI brain scan. Surviving infants were assessed between the age of 5 and 6 years using the Touwen Examination, the Movement ABC and the WPPSI-R. Results: Fifteen of the 68 infants (22%) died in the neonatal period. Of the 53 surviving infants, 19 (36%) had cerebral palsy. The remaining 34 were considered normal at 2 years of age but, when assessed at school age, 8 (15%) had minor neurological dysfunction and/or perceptual-motor difficulties, 1 (2%) had only cognitive impairment and 25 (47%) were normal. The outcome largely reflected the pattern of lesions on brain imaging. While 83% of those with a normal outcome had normal scans or minimal white matter lesions, 80% of those with minor neurological dysfunction and/or perceptual-motor difficulties had mild or moderate basal ganglia or more marked white matter lesions. Conclusion: Continued surveillance is recommended for children with apparently normal outcome at two years of age after NE, particularly when abnormalities are detected on brain MRI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据