4.7 Article

DRY MERGERS AND THE FORMATION OF EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES: CONSTRAINTS FROM LENSING AND DYNAMICS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 703, 期 2, 页码 1531-1544

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/2/1531

关键词

galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies: formation; galaxies: kinematics and dynamics; galaxies: structure; gravitational lensing

资金

  1. NASA through a grant from the Space Telescope Science Institute [10174, 10587, 10886, 10494, 10798, 11202, NAS 5-26555]
  2. Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy, Inc
  3. NSF through CAREER [NSF-0642621]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dissipationless (gas-free or dry) mergers have been suggested to play a major role in the formation and evolution of early-type galaxies, particularly in growing their mass and size without altering their stellar populations. We perform a new test of the dry-merger hypothesis by comparing N-body simulations of realistic systems to empirical constraints provided by recent studies of lens early-type galaxies. We find that major and minor dry mergers (1) preserve the nearly isothermal structure (rho(tot) proportional to r(-2)) of early-type galaxies within the observed scatter, (2) do not change more than the observed scatter the ratio between total mass M and virial mass R(e)sigma(2)(e2)/2G (where R(e) is the half-light radius and sigma(e2) is the projected velocity dispersion), (3) strongly increase galaxy sizes (R(e) proportional to M(0.85 +/- 0.17)) and weakly increase velocity dispersions (sigma(e2) proportional to M(0.06 +/-) (0.08)) with mass, thus moving galaxies away from the local observed M-R(e) and M-sigma(e2) relations, and (4) introduce substantial scatter in the M-R(e) and M-sigma(e2) relations. Our findings imply that-unless there is a high degree of fine tuning of the mix of progenitors and types of interactions-present-day massive early-type galaxies could not have assembled more than similar to 50% of their mass, and increased their size by more than a factor similar to 1.8, via dry merging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据