4.2 Article

Characterization of a candidate Trypanosoma rangeli small nucleolar RNA gene and its application in a PCR-based parasite detection

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL PARASITOLOGY
卷 102, 期 2, 页码 72-80

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-4894(03)00027-4

关键词

Trypanosoma rangeli; Trypanosoma cruzi; Trypanosoma brucei; Trypanosoma vivax; Leptomona collosoma; Leishmania tarentolae; Leishmania amazonensis; Leishmania panamensis; Crithidia fasciculata; Rhodnius prolixus; snoRNA; small nucleolar RNA; kinetoplast; KP1 (+); KP1 (-); polymerase chain reaction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we report the isolation and characterization of a candidate Trypanosoma rangeli small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA) gene, and the development of a PCR assay for detection of the parasite based on its nucleotide sequence. This gene, isolated from a T. rangeli genomic sub-library, was named snoRNA-c11 and is encoded by a multi-copy gene of 801 bp in length. Computer sequence analysis of snoRNA-c11 showed the presence of two sequence motifs, box C and box D, as well as of two long stretches that perfectly complement the universal core region of the mature rRNA 28S, suggesting that c11 encodes for a Box C/D snoRNA from the parasite. Hybridization analysis using c11 as probe, showed a weak hybridization signal with Trypanosoma cruzi DNA, demonstrating the existence of differences in this locus between these two species. Two oligonucleotide primers from this gene, which specifically amplified a 620-bp fragment in KP1 (+) and KP1 (-) strains of T rangeli, were used in a PCR assay. The amplification allowed the detection of 1 pg of DNA in the presence of heterologous DNA and no amplification was observed with different T cruzi strains (groups I and 11). In addition, the PCR assay reported here is able to detect T rangeli in the presence of T cruzi DNA, and is useful for detection of the parasite in samples from infected vectors. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据