4.6 Article

Direct costs of severe sepsis in three German intensive care units based on retrospective electronic patient record analysis of resource use

期刊

INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE
卷 28, 期 10, 页码 1440-1446

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1429-9

关键词

intensive care; health-care costs; hospital costs; cost of treatment; sepsis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine the direct costs of severe sepsis patients in German intensive care units (ICUs). Design: Retrospective electronic data analysis. Setting: Three adult intensive care units (surgical/medical) in three university hospitals in Germany. Patients: 385 patients identified by standard definitions as suffering from severe sepsis. Measurements and results: A bottom-up approach was used to determine the direct ICU cost on actual resource use (medication, laboratory tests, microbiological analysis, disposables, and clinical procedures) for patients with severe sepsis. To determine the total direct costs, center-specific personnel and basic bed (hotel) costs were added to total resources consumed. Average hospital mortality of severely septic patients was 42.6%. Mean ICU length of stay (LOS) was 16.6 days. Survivors stayed on average 4 days longer than nonsurvivors. The mean direct ICU costs of care were 23,297 +/- 18,631 euros per patient and 1,318 euros per day. In comparison, average daily charges being paid for an ICU patient by the health care system in Germany are 851 euros (based on official statistics). Nonsurvivors were more expensive than survivors in total direct costs (25,446 vs. 21,984 euros) and in per day direct cost (1,649 vs. 1, 162 euros). Medication makes up the largest part of the direct costs, followed by expenses for personnel. Conclusions: Patients with severe sepsis have a high ICU mortality rate and long ICU LOS and are substantially expensive to treat. Nonsurviving septic patients are more costly than survivors despite shorter ICU LOS. This is due to higher medication costs indicating increased efforts to keep patients alive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据