4.7 Article

Impact of low concentration factor microfiltration on milk component recovery and Cheddar cheese yield

期刊

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
卷 85, 期 10, 页码 2415-2424

出版社

AMER DAIRY SCIENCE ASSOC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74324-5

关键词

Cheddar cheese; microfiltration; concentration factor; yield

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of microfiltration (MF) on the composition of Cheddar cheese, fat; crude-protein (CP), calcium, total solids recovery,. and Cheddar- cheese yield efficiency (i.e., composition adjusted yield divided by theoretical yield) was determined. Raw skim milk was microfiltered twofold using a 0.1-mum ceramic membrane at 50degreesC. Four vats of cheese were made in one day using milk at 1x, 1.26x, 1.51x, and 1:82x concentration factor (CF). An appropriate amount of cream was added to achieve a constant casein (CN)-to-fat ratio across treatments. Cheese manufacture was repeated on four different days using a randomized complete block design. The composition of the cheese was affected by MF. Moisture content of the cheese decreased, with increasing MF CF. Standardization of milk to a constant CN-to-fat ratio did not eliminate the effect of MF on cheese moisture content. Fat recovery in cheese was not changed by MF. Separation of cream prior to MF, followed by the recombination of skim or MF retentate with cream resulted in lower fat recovery in cheese for control and all treatments and higher fat loss in whey when compared to previous yield experiments, when control Cheddar cheese was made from unseparated milk. Crude, protein, calcium, and total solids recovery in cheese increased with-increasing MF CF, due to partial removal of these components prior to cheese making. Calcium and calcium as a percentage of. protein increased in the cheese; suggesting an increase in calcium retention in the cheese with increasing CF. While the actual and composition adjusted cheese yields increased with increasing MY CF, as expected, there was no effect of MF CF on cheese yield efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据