4.7 Article

Heritability of carotid artery structure and function - The Strong Heart Family Study

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000032656.91352.5E

关键词

carotid artery structure and function; heritability; American Indians; Strong Heart Family Study

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [U01 HL-41642, U01 HL-65521, U01 HL-65520, U01 HL-41654, U01 HL-41652] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [U01 MH-59590] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective-Alterations in carotid artery structure and function may represent phenotypic measures of vascular disease that contain information beyond that which can be inferred from conventional cardiovascular disease risk assessment. However, apart from their associations with cardiovascular disease risk factors and outcome, the genetic basis of variations in carotid artery structure and function is largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the genetic and environmental contributions to carotid artery structure and function in 3 large groups of American Indians. Methods and Results-Approximately 950 men and women, aged greater than or equal to 18 years, in 32 extended families were examined between 1997 and 1999. By use of a variance component approach and the program Sequential Oligogenic Linkage Analysis Routines, heritabilities for carotid artery structure and function phenotypes were estimated. After accounting for the effects of covariates (sex, age, diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance, smoking, cholesterol, body surface area, and hypertension), we detected significant heritabilities (given as h(2) values) for common carotid artery diastolic diameter (h(2) <0.44), intimal-medial wall thickness (h(2) <0.21), vascular mass (h(2) <0.27), arterial stiffness (h(2) <0.23), and the augmentation index (h(2) < 0.18). Conclusions-These results suggest that the additive effects of genes explain a moderate proportion of the variability of carotid artery structure and function.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据