4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Probing the link between citrate and malonyl-CoA in perfused rat hearts

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00244.2002

关键词

gas chromatography-mass spectrometry; adenosine 5 '-triphosphate-citrate lyase; hydroxycitrate; acetyl-coenzyme A; citric acid cycle; C-13-substrate; isotopomer analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Little is known about the sources of cytosolic acetyl-CoA used for the synthesis of malonyl-CoA, a key regulator of fatty acid oxidation in the heart. We tested the hypothesis that citrate provides acetyl-CoA for malonyl-CoA synthesis after its mitochondrial efflux and cleavage by cytosolic ATP-citrate lyase. We expanded on a previous study where we characterized citrate release from perfused rat hearts (Vincent G, Comte B, Poirier M, and Des Rosiers C. Citrate release by perfused rat hearts: a window on mitochondrial cataplerosis. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 278: E846- E856, 2000). In the present study, we show that citrate release rates, ranging from 6 to 22 nmol/min, can support a net increase in malonyl-CoA concentrations induced by changes in substrate supply, at most 0.7 nmol/min. In experiments with [U-C-13]( lactate + pyruvate) and [1-C-13] oleate, we show that the acetyl moiety of malonyl-CoA is derived from both pyruvate and long-chain fatty acids. This C-13-labeling of malonyl-CoA occurred without any changes in its concentration. Hydroxycitrate, an inhibitor of ATP-citrate lyase, prevents increases in malonyl-CoA concentrations and decreases its labeling from [U-C-13](lactate + pyruvate). Our data support at least a partial role of citrate in the transfer from the mitochondria to cytosol of acetyl units for malonyl-CoA synthesis. In addition, they provide a dynamic picture of malonyl-CoA metabolism: even when the malonyl-CoA concentration remains constant, there appears to be a constant need to supply acetyl-CoA from various carbon sources, both carbohydrates and lipids, for malonyl-CoA synthesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据