4.7 Article

ENHANCED DENSE GAS FRACTION IN ULTRALUMINOUS INFRARED GALAXIES

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 707, 期 2, 页码 1217-1232

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1217

关键词

galaxies: evolution; galaxies: fundamental parameters; galaxies: ISM; infrared: galaxies; radio lines: galaxies; submillimeter

资金

  1. FQRNT
  2. NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED)
  3. Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology
  4. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a detailed analysis of the relation between infrared luminosity and molecular line luminosity, for a variety of molecular transitions, using a sample of 34 nearby galaxies spanning a broad range of infrared luminosities (10(10) L-circle dot < L-IR < 10(12.5) L circle dot()). We show that the power-law index of the relation is sensitive to the critical density of the molecular gas tracer used, and that the dominant driver in observed molecular line ratios in galaxies is the gas density. As most nearby ultraluminous infrared galaxies (ULIRGs) exhibit strong signatures of active galactic nuclei (AGNs) in their center, we revisit previous claims questioning the reliability of HCN as a probe of the dense gas responsible for star formation in the presence of AGNs. We find that the enhanced HCN(1-0)/CO(1-0) luminosity ratio observed in ULIRGs can be successfully reproduced using numerical models with fixed chemical abundances and without AGN-induced chemistry effects. We extend this analysis to a total of 10 molecular line ratios by combining the following transitions: CO(1-0), HCO+(1-0), HCO+(3-2), HCN(1-0), and HCN(3-2). Our results suggest that AGNs reside in systems with higher dense gas fraction, and that chemistry or other effects associated with their hard radiation field may not dominate (NGC 1068 is one exception). Galaxy merger could be the underlying cause of increased dense gas fraction, and the evolutionary stage of such mergers may be another determinant of the HCN/CO luminosity ratio.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据