4.6 Article

Analysis of microbial community composition in a lab-scale membrane distillation bioreactor

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
卷 118, 期 4, 页码 940-953

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/jam.12759

关键词

community composition; community diversity; membrane biofouling; membrane distillation bioreactor; thermophiles

资金

  1. Environment and Water Industry Programme Office of Singapore [MEWR C651/06/177]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimsMembrane distillation bioreactors (MDBR) have potential for industrial applications where wastewater is hot or waste heat is available, but the role of micro-organisms in MDBRs has never been determined, and thus was the purpose of this study. Methods and ResultsMicrobial communities were characterized by bacterial and archaeal 16S and eukaryotic 18S rRNA gene tag-encoded pyrosequencing of DNA obtained from sludge. Taxonomy-independent analysis revealed that bacterial communities had a relatively low richness and diversity, and community composition strongly correlated with conductivity, total nitrogen and bound extracellular polymeric substances (EPS). Taxonomy-dependent analysis revealed that Rubrobacter and Caldalkalibacillus were abundant members of the bacterial community, but no archaea were detected. Eukaryotic communities had a relatively high richness and diversity, and both changes in community composition and abundance of the dominant genus, Candida, correlated with bound EPS. ConclusionsThermophilic MDBR communities were comprised of a low diversity bacterial community and a highly diverse eukaryotic community with no archea detected. Communities exhibited low resilience to changes in operational parameters. Specifically, retenatate nutrient composition and concentration was strongly correlated with the dominant species. Significance and Impact of the StudyThis study provides an understanding of microbial community diversity in an MDBR, which is fundamental to the optimization of reactor performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据