4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

The role of hypoxia-inducible signaling pathway in nickel carcinogenesis

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
卷 110, 期 -, 页码 831-834

出版社

US DEPT HEALTH HUMAN SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.02110s5831

关键词

gene chip; HIF knockout; hypoxia; transcription factors

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [CA 16087] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIEHS NIH HHS [ES 00260, ES 05512, ES 10344] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Using human and rodent cells in vitro, we characterized a hypoxia-inducible signaling pathway as one of the pathways affected by carcinogenic nickel compounds. Acute exposure to nickel activates hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-1 (HIF-1), which strongly induces hypoxia-inducible genes, including the recently discovered tumor marker Cap43. This gene has been cloned based on its nickel inducibility and was found to be highly inducible by hypoxia. To identify other HIF-1-dependent/independent nickel-inducible genes, we used cells obtained from HIF-1alpha null mouse embryos and analyzed gene expression changes using the microarray technique. We found that genes coding for glycolytic enzymes, known to be regulated by HIF-1, were also induced in nickel-exposed cells. In addition, we identified a number of new genes highly induced by nickel in an HIF-dependent manner. Elevated HIT-1 activity after acute nickel exposure might be selectively advantageous because nickel-transformed rodent and human cells possess increased HIT-1 transcriptional activity. Hypoxia plays an important role in tumor progression. It selects for cells with enhanced glycolytic activity, causing production of large amounts of lactic acid, one of the most common features of tumor cells (Warburg effect). Here, we hypothesize that exposure to nickel activates the hypoxia-inducible pathway and facilitates selection of cells with increased transcriptional activity of hypoxia-inducible genes, which may be important in the nickel-induced carcinogenic process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据