4.7 Article

THE LOW LEVEL OF DEBRIS DISK ACTIVITY AT THE TIME OF THE LATE HEAVY BOMBARDMENT: A SPITZER STUDY OF PRAESEPE

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 697, 期 2, 页码 1578-1596

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1578

关键词

circumstellar matter; infrared: stars; open clusters and associations: individual (Praesepe M44, NGC 2632, Beehive); planetary systems: formation; stars: evolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present 24 mu m photometry of the intermediate-age open cluster Praesepe. We assemble a catalog of 193 probable cluster members that are detected in optical databases, the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS), and at 24 mu m, within an area of similar to 2.47 deg(2). Mid-IR excesses indicating debris disks are found for one early-type and for three solar-type stars. Corrections for sampling statistics yield a 24 mu m excess fraction (debris disk fraction) of 6.5% +/- 4.1% for luminous and 1.9% +/- 1.2% for solar-type stars. The incidence of excesses is in agreement with the decay trend of debris disks as a function of age observed for other cluster and field stars. The values also agree with those for older stars, indicating that debris generation in the zones that emit at 24 mu m falls to the older 1-10 Gyr field star sample value by roughly 750 Myr. We discuss our results in the context of previous observations of excess fractions for early- and solar-type stars. We show that solar-type stars lose their debris disk 24 mu m excesses on a shorter timescale than early- type stars. Simplistic Monte Carlo models suggest that, during the first Gyr of their evolution, up to 15%-30% of solar-type stars might undergo an orbital realignment of giant planets such as the one thought to have led to the Late Heavy Bombardment, if the length of the bombardment episode is similar to the one thought to have happened in our solar system. In the Appendix, we determine the cluster's parameters via bootstrap Monte Carlo isochrone fitting, yielding an age of 757 Myr (+/- 36 Myr at 1 sigma confidence) and a distance of 179 pc (+/- 2 pc at 1 sigma confidence), not allowing for systematic errors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据