4.7 Article

IMPROVED CONSTRAINTS ON PRIMORDIAL NON-GAUSSIANITY FOR THE WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE 5-YEAR DATA

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 706, 期 1, 页码 399-403

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/399

关键词

cosmic microwave background; methods: data analysis

资金

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [AYA2007-68058-C03-02]
  2. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present constraints on the nonlinear coupling parameter f(nl) with the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) data. We use an updated method based on the spherical Mexican hat wavelet (SMHW) which provides improved constraints on the f(nl) parameter. This paper is a continuation of a previous work by Curto et al., where several third-order statistics based on the SMHW were considered. In this paper, we use all the possible third-order statistics computed from the wavelet coefficient maps evaluated at 12 angular scales. The scales are logarithmically distributed from 6.9 arcmin to 500 arcmin. Our analysis indicates that f(nl) is constrained to -18 < f(nl) < +80 at 95% confidence level (CL) for the combined V+W WMAP map. This value has been corrected by the presence of undetected point sources, which adds a positive contribution of Delta f(nl) = 6 +/- 5. Our result excludes at similar to 99% CL the best-fitting value f(nl) = 87 reported by Yadav & Wandelt. We have also constrained f(nl) for the Q, V, and W frequency bands separately, finding compatibility with zero at 95% CL for the Q and V bands but not for the W band. We have performed some further tests to understand the cause of this deviation which indicate that systematics associated with the W radiometers could be responsible for this result. Finally, we have performed a Galactic north-south analysis for f(nl). We have not found any asymmetry, i.e., the best-fitting fnl for the northern pixels is compatible with the best-fitting f(nl) for the southern pixels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据