4.5 Article

Identification of 7(8) and 8(9) unsaturated adrenal steroid metabolites produced by patients with 7-dehydrosterol-Δ7-reductase deficiency (Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome)

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-0760(02)00155-3

关键词

Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome; GC/MS; urinary steroids; cholesterol biosynthetic disorders

资金

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [R03 HD39707] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Patients with Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome have impaired ability to synthesize cholesterol due to attenuated activity of 7-dehydrosterol-Delta(7)-reductase which catalyses the final step in cholesterol synthesis. Accumulation of 7- and 8-dehydrocholesterol is a result of the disorder and potentially these sterols could be used as precursors of a novel class of Delta(7) and Delta(8) unsaturated adrenal steroids and their metabolites. In this study, we have analyzed urine from SLOS patients in the anticipation of characterizing such metabolites. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GUMS) was used in the identification of two major metabolites as 7- and 8-dehydroversions of the well-known steroid pregnanetriol. Other steroids, such as 8-dehydro dehydroepiandrosterone (8-dehydro DHEA) and 7- or 8-dehydroandrostenediol were also identified, and several more steroids are present in urine but remain uncharacterized. As yet, the study provides no evidence for the production of ring-B unsaturated metabolites of complex steroids, such as conisol. We believe that the following transformations can utilize ring-B dehydroprecursors: StAR transport of cholesterol, p450 side chain cleavage, 17-hydroxylase/17,20-lyase, 3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, 3alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase, 20alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and 5beta-reductase. We have yet to prove the activity of adrenal 21-hydroxylase, 11beta-hydroxylase or 5alpha-reductase towards 7- or 8-dehydroprecursors. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据