4.4 Article

Genetic diversity and relationships among pea cultivars revealed by RAPDs and AFLPs

期刊

PLANT BREEDING
卷 121, 期 5, 页码 429-435

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.733320.x

关键词

Pisum sativum L.; AFLP; genetic similarity; pedigree data; RAPD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to obtain an overview of the genetic diversity present within the set of pea cultivars released in Germany, 21 cultivars were analysed at the DNA level by random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs) and amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs), as well as for agronomic traits. Yield of grain cultivars ranged from 2.95 to 3.87 t/ha. Based on the screening of 60 RAPD primers and 32 EcoRI+ 3/MseI+ 3 AFLP primer combinations, 20 RAPD primers and 11 Eco RI+ 3/ Mse I+ 3 primer combinations generating polymorphic and distinct fragments were chosen for estimation of genetic diversity. Twenty RAPD primers amplified a total of 314 scorable bands ranging from about 262 bp to 1996 bp. Of these, 175 fragments (55.7%) were polymorphic. Based on these data, genetic similarity (GS) was estimated between 0.80 ('Lisa vs. 'Grapis') and 0.94 ('Bohatyr' vs. 'Sponsor'; mean GS = 0.88). Eleven AFLP primer combinations led to the amplification of 949 scorable fragments ranging from 43 to 805 bp and of these, 462 ( 48.7%) were polymorphic. Genetic similarity based on AFLPs was calculated between 0.85 ('Lisa vs. 'Laser') and 0.94 ('Bohatyr' vs. 'Sponsor', mean GS = 0.90). Correlation of genetic similarity estimated on RAPDs and AFLPs was estimated at r = 0.79** using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient and at r = 0.84 by the Mantel test, respectively. UPGMA cluster analysis carried out on these data separately for RAPDs and AFLPs and on the combined data reflected, to some extent, pedigree relationships and cophenetic correlations ( r = 0.89 for RAPDs, r = 0.88 for AFLPs, and r = 0.93 RAPDs + AFLPs) indicate a good fit of respective clusters to genetic similarity data. The correlation of cluster analyses to pedigree information and the impact on parental genotype selection is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据