4.7 Article

SPATIO-KINEMATIC STRUCTURE AT THE BASE OF THE [Fe II] JETS FROM L1551 IRS 5

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 694, 期 1, 页码 654-663

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/694/1/654

关键词

ISM: Herbig-Haro objects; ISM: individual (HH 154, L1551); ISM: jets and outflows; stars: formation; stars: pre-main sequence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present observational results of the [Fe II] lambda 1.644 mu m emission from the jets of L1551 IRS 5. The data sets were obtained through 13 fully sampled slits aimed at the base of the jets. These sets are used to construct a three-dimensional cube. The field of view was 5 ''.8 x 4 ''.2. We confirmed that the position of the knot PHK1 coincides with a stationary, pointlike X-ray source within +/- 0 ''.3. The northern and southern jets are distinguished from each other at a point 0 ''.6 away from their driving sources. We also confirmed that the northern jet consists of well-separated high- and low-velocity components (HVC and LVC, respectively). The HVC has a terminal velocity of similar to 400 km s(-1), and shows a consistently narrow velocity width of 40 km s-1. The LVC covers the velocity range from V(LSR) = 0 to - 240 km s(-1) and has broad velocity widths of similar to 150 - 180 km s(-1). These decrease with distance from the driving sources. The spatial width of the LVC varies from 0 ''.6-0 ''.7 at V(LSR) similar to - 200 km s(-1) to 0 ''.8-0 ''.9 at V(LSR) similar to - 30 km s(-1). These characteristics are well understood in terms of the two types of outflow mechanisms that are working simultaneously: one is the HVC, which is launched in a narrow, inner radial region at 0.04-0.05 AU, and the other is the LVC, which is launched in a wider, outer radial region from within 0.1-4.5 AU of the accretion disk. Part of the LVC emission could arise in the gas entrained or shocked by the HVC. We also discuss the possibility that part of the HVC gas is thermalized at PHK1 to produce the X-ray emission and LVC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据