4.7 Article

THE GAS TEMPERATURE OF STARLESS CORES IN PERSEUS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 691, 期 2, 页码 1754-1763

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/691/2/1754

关键词

stars: formation; ISM: molecules

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [AST 05-40399]
  2. NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellowship [AST-0502605]
  3. NSERC of Canada
  4. NRAO Student Observing Support [GSSP06-0015]
  5. Spitzer Space Telescope Fellowship Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, we study the determinants of starless core temperatures in the Perseus molecular cloud. We use NH3 (1,1) and (2,2) observations to derive core temperatures (T-kin) and data from the COMPLETE Survey of Star-Forming Regions and the c2d Spitzer Legacy Survey for observations of the other core and molecular cloud properties. The kinetic temperature distribution probed by NH3 is in the fairly narrow range of similar to 9-15 K. We find that cores within the clusters IC348 and NGC1333 are significantly warmer than field starless cores, and T-kin is higher within regions of larger extinction-derived column density. Starless cores in the field are warmer when they are closer to Class 0/I protostars, but this effect is not seen for those cores in clusters. For field starless cores, T-kin is higher in regions in which the (CO)-C-13 line width and the 1.1 mm flux from the core are larger, and T-kin is lower when the the peak column density within the core and average volume density of the core are larger. There is no correlation between T-kin and (CO)-C-13 line width, 1.1 mm flux, density, or peak column density for those cores in clusters. The temperature of the cloud material along the line of sight to the core, as measured by CO or far-infrared emission from dust, is positively correlated with core temperature when considering the collection of cores in the field and in clusters, but this effect is not apparent when the two subsamples of cores are considered separately.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据