4.7 Article

THE MASS-METALLICITY GRADIENT RELATION OF EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 691, 期 2, 页码 L138-L141

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/691/2/L138

关键词

galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: elliptical and lenticular, cD; galaxies: formation; galaxies: stellar content

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a newly observed relation between galaxy mass and radial metallicity gradients of early-type galaxies. Our sample of 51 early-type galaxies encompasses a comprehensive mass range from dwarfs to brightest cluster galaxies. The metallicity gradients are measured out to one effective radius by comparing nearly all of the Lick absorption-line indices to recent models of single stellar populations. The relation shows very different behavior at low and high masses, with a sharp transition being seen at a mass of similar to 3.5 x 10(10) M circle dot (velocity dispersion of similar to 140 km s(-1), M(B) similar to -19). Low-mass galaxies form a tight relation with mass, such that metallicity gradients become shallower with decreasing mass and positive at the very low mass end. Above the mass transition point several massive galaxies have steeper gradients, but a clear downturn is visible marked by a broad scatter. The results are interpreted in comparison with competing model predictions. We find that an early star-forming collapse could have acted as the main mechanism for the formation of low-mass galaxies, with star formation efficiency increasing with galactic mass. The high-mass downturn could be a consequence of merging and the observed larger scatter a natural result of different merger properties. These results suggest that galaxies above the mass threshold of similar to 3.5 x 10(10) M circle dot might have formed initially by mergers of gas-rich disk galaxies and then subsequently evolved via dry merger events. The varying efficiency of the dissipative merger-induced starburst and feedback processes have shaped the radial metallicity gradients in these high-mass systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据