4.7 Article

BLAST OBSERVATIONS OF RESOLVED GALAXIES: TEMPERATURE PROFILES AND THE EFFECT OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI ON FIR TO SUBMILLIMETER EMISSION

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 707, 期 2, 页码 1809-1823

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1809

关键词

balloons; galaxies: photometry; submillimeter; telescopes

资金

  1. NASA [NAG5-12785, NAG5-13301, NNGO-6GI11G]
  2. Canadian Space Agency (CSA)
  3. Canada's Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
  4. UK Particle Physics & Astronomy Research Council (PPARC)
  5. STFC [ST/G002711/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over the course of two flights, the Balloon-borne Large Aperture Submillimeter Telescope (BLAST) made resolved maps of seven nearby (< 25 Mpc) galaxies at 250, 350, and 500 mu m. During its 2005 June flight from Sweden, BLAST observed a single nearby galaxy, NGC 4565. During the 2006 December flight from Antarctica, BLAST observed the nearby galaxies NGC 1097, NGC 1291, NGC 1365, NGC 1512, NGC 1566, and NGC 1808. We fit physical dust models to a combination of BLAST observations and other available data for the galaxies observed by Spitzer. We fit a modified blackbody to the remaining galaxies to obtain total dust mass and mean dust temperature. For the four galaxies with Spitzer data, we also produce maps and radial profiles of dust column density and temperature. We measure the fraction of BLAST detected flux originating from the central cores of these galaxies and use this to calculate a core fraction, an upper limit on the active galactic nucleus fraction of these galaxies. We also find our resolved observations of these galaxies give a dust mass estimate 5-19 times larger than an unresolved observation would predict. Finally, we are able to use these data to derive a value for the dust mass absorption coefficient of kappa = 0.29 +/- 0.03 m(2) kg(-1) at 250 mu m. This study is an introduction to future higher-resolution and higher-sensitivity studies to be conducted by Herschel and SCUBA-2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据