4.5 Article

Gleaning as a foraging strategy in Natterer's bat Myotis nattereri

期刊

BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY
卷 52, 期 5, 页码 408-416

出版社

SPRINGER-VERLAG
DOI: 10.1007/s00265-002-0531-x

关键词

gleaning; echolocation; diet; interfemoral membrane

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natterer's bats, Myotis nattereri, continued to emit echolocation calls while gleaning non-flying arthropods, and made little use of prey-generated sound as a cue to locate them. Feeding buzzes were recorded during most attacks. In contrast, brown long-eared bats, Plecotus auritus, in parallel experiments, stopped echolocating during the hovering phase of gleaning attacks, did not emit feeding buzzes and used prey-generated sound as a cue to find food. In uncluttered foraging situations, M. nattereri were able to locate prey by echolocation alone, but in clutter they may have combined it with associative learning, and may also have gleaned prey after being attracted to food sources by feeding buzzes from conspecifics. Both in a flight room and in the wild, Natterer's bats foraged using a sequence of low searching flight, hovering, capture using the interfemoral membrane and prey consumption at a perch or on the wing. They also landed and pursued prey by quadrupedal locomotion. Their diet consisted mainly of medium-sized (5-15 mm body length) arthropods, particularly dung-flies, spiders, beetles and harvestmen, active on plant surfaces at night, some of which could only have been captured by gleaning. Moths were eaten in relatively small quantities, suggesting that the bats were unable to hear their fluttering sounds or that tympanate moth species could detect the bats' approach and take avoiding action. In the same area, moths formed the major component of the diet of P. auritus, reflecting the different foraging techniques of the two bat species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据