4.7 Article

IONIZED GAS TOWARD MOLECULAR CLUMPS: PHYSICAL PROPERTIES OF MASSIVE STAR-FORMING REGIONS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 707, 期 1, 页码 283-309

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/283

关键词

circumstellar matter; H II regions; radio continuum: stars; stars: formation; stars: winds, outflows

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [AST-9800334, AST-0098562, AST-0100793, AST-0228993, AST-0507657]
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. U. S. National Science Foundation
  4. STFC
  5. NRAO Graduate Student Internship Program
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D000890/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. STFC [PP/D000890/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have conducted a search for ionized gas at 3.6 cm, using the Very Large Array, toward 31 Galactic intermediate- and high-mass clumps detected in previous millimeter continuum observations. In the 10 observed fields, 35 H II regions are identified, of which 20 are newly discovered. Many of the H II regions are multiply peaked indicating the presence of a cluster of massive stars. We find that the ionized gas tends to be associated toward the millimeter clumps; of the 31 millimeter clumps observed, nine of these appear to be physically related to ionized gas, and a further six have ionized gas emission within 1'. For clumps with associated ionized gas, the combined mass of the ionizing massive stars is compared to the clump masses to provide an estimate of the instantaneous star formation efficiency. These values range from a few percent to 25%, and have an average of 7% +/- 8%. We also find a correlation between the clump mass and the mass of the ionizing massive stars within it, which is consistent with a power law. This result is comparable to the prediction of star formation by competitive accretion that a power-law relationship exists between the mass of the most massive star in a cluster and the total mass of the remaining stars.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据