4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Effect of prolonged gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in patients with endometriosis

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 78, 期 4, 页码 699-704

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03373-3

关键词

endometriosis; infertility; in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer; GnRH agonist

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a 3-month course of GnRH agonist administered immediately before IVF-ET in infertile patients with endometriosis. Design: Prospective, randomized trial. Setting: Three tertiary care assisted reproductive technology programs. Patient(s): IVF-ET candidates with surgically confirmed endometriosis. Intervention (s): Twenty-five patients received three courses of a long-acting GnRH agonist, 3.75 mg i.m. every 28 days, followed by standard controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Twenty-six patients received standard controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with mid-luteal phase GnRH agonist down-regulation or microdose flare regimens. Main Outcome Measure(s): Response to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation, ongoing pregnancy rates per cycle, group implantation rates, and implantation rate per embryo transfer procedure. Result(s): The extent of surgically confirmed endometriosis was greater in patients who received the long-acting GnRH regimen for 3 months before IVF-FT. The groups did not differ significantly in terms of dose or duration of gonadotropin stimulation, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, or number of embryos transferred, Patients who received the long-acting GnRH regimen had significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rates (80% vs. 53.85%) and a trend toward higher implantation rates (42.68% vs. 30.38%). Conclusion(s): Prolonged use of GnRH agonist before IVF-ET in patients with endometriosis resulted in Significantly higher ongoing pregnancy rates than did standard controlled ovarian hyperstimulation regimens. No deleterious effect on ovarian response was observed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据