4.7 Article

SILICA IN PROTOPLANETARY DISKS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 690, 期 2, 页码 1193-1207

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1193

关键词

circumstellar matter; infrared: stars; stars: pre-main sequence; planetary systems: protoplanetary disks

资金

  1. NASA [1257184]
  2. Spitzer Fellowship Program [011 808001]
  3. JPL [960803]
  4. Cornell [31419-5714]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mid-infrared spectra of a few T Tauri stars (TTS) taken with the Infrared Spectrograph on board the Spitzer Space Telescope show prominent narrow emission features indicating silica (crystalline silicon dioxide). Silica is not a major constituent of the interstellar medium; therefore, any silica present in the circumstellar protoplanetary disks of TTS must be largely the result of processing of primitive dust material in the disks surrouding these stars. We model the silica emission features in our spectra using the opacities of various polymorphs of silica and their amorphous versions computed from earth-based laboratory measurements. This modeling indicates that the two polymorphs of silica, tridymite and cristobalite, which form at successively higher temperatures and low pressures, are the dominant forms of silica in the TTS of our sample. These high-temperature, low-pressure polymorphs of silica present in protoplanetary disks are consistent with a grain composed mostly of tridymite named Ada found in the cometary dust samples collected from the STARDUST mission to Comet 81P/Wild 2. The silica in these protoplanetary disks may arise from incongruent melting of enstatite or from incongruent melting of amorphous pyroxene, the latter being analogous to the former. The high temperatures of similar to 1200-1300 K and rapid cooling required to crystallize tridymite or cristobalite set constraints on the mechanisms that could have formed the silica in these protoplanetary disks, suggestive of processing of these grains during the transient heating events hypothesized to create chondrules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据