4.7 Article

THE FIRST POSITIVE DETECTION OF MOLECULAR GAS IN A GRB HOST GALAXY

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 691, 期 1, 页码 L27-L32

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/691/1/L27

关键词

gamma rays: bursts; ISM: molecules

资金

  1. NASA/Swift [NNX07 AE94G]
  2. NSF CAREER [AST-0548180, AST-0607485]
  3. TABASGO Foundation
  4. AutoScope Corp.
  5. Lick Observatory
  6. Sylvia & Jim Kantzman Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on strong H(2) and CO absorption from gas within the host galaxy of gamma-ray burst (GRB) 080607. Analysis of our Keck/LRIS afterglow spectrum reveals a very large Hi column density (N(Hi) = 10(22.70 +/- 0.15) cm(-2)) and strong metal-line absorption at z(GRB) = 3.0363 with a roughly solar metallicity. We detect a series of A - X bandheads from CO and estimate N(CO) = 10(16.5 +/- 0.3) cm(-2) and T(ex)(CO) > 100 K. We argue that the high excitation temperature results from UV pumping of the CO gas by the GRB afterglow. Similarly, we observe H(2) absorption via the Lyman-Werner bands and estimate N(H2) = 10(21.2 +/- 0.2) cm(-2) with T(ex)(H2) = 10-300 K. The afterglow photometry suggests an extinction law with R(V) approximate to 4 and A(V) approximate to 3.2 mag and requires the presence of a modest 2175 angstrom bump. Additionally, modeling of the Swift XRT X-ray spectrum confirms a large column density with N(H) = 10(22.58 +/- 0.04) cm(-2). Remarkably, this molecular gas has extinction properties, metallicity, and a CO/H(2) ratio comparable to those of translucent molecular clouds of the Milky Way, suggesting that star formation at high z proceeds in similar environments as today. However, the integrated dust-to-metals ratio is sub-Galactic, suggesting the dust is primarily associated with the molecular phase while the atomic gas has a much lower dust-to-gas ratio. Sightlines like GRB 080607 serve as powerful probes of nucleosynthesis and star-forming regions in the young universe and contribute to the population of dark GRB afterglows.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据