4.6 Article

A prospective multicenter study of factors associated with hospital admission among adults with acute asthma

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 113, 期 5, 页码 371-378

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9343(02)01242-1

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: We sought to determine patient characteristics associated with hospital admission after emergency, treatment for asthma, and whether disposition guidelines are followed. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective multicenter cohort study involving 64 emergency departments in the United States and Canada. Consecutive adult patients with asthma exacerbations were interviewed, and their charts were reviewed using standardized protocols. Telephone follow-up at 2 weeks determined relapse. RESULTS: Of 1805 patients, 363 (20%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 18% to 22%) were hospitalized. Among patients with severe exacerbations (final peak flow <50% of predicted), 122 (49%; 95% CI: 43% to 55%) were hospitalized. Admission was associated with final peak flow, female sex, nonwhite race, severity of chronic illness, and severity of exacerbation. Admission predictors were similar regardless of hospital funding, re-gion, or size. Among patients with mild or moderate exacerbations of asthma (peak flow greater than or equal to50% predicted), the likelihood of admission was associated significantly with the number of predefined risk factors for death from asthma. Of patients who were discharged from the emergency department, 62 (5%; 95% Cl: 4% to 6%) relapsed within 72 hours. Relapse was not associated with final peak flow (P = 0.39). CONCLUSION: Associations between patient characteristics and disposition were similar across sites. Despite guidelines to the contrary, half of patients with final peak flow <50% were discharged. After emergency department treatment and discharge, short-term relapse was uncommon among patients with asthma, suggesting that strict peak flow cutoffs may be unnecessary if risk factors in patients with mild or moderate exacerbations are considered. (C) 2002 by Excerpta Medica, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据