4.7 Article

A SENSITIVE SEARCH FOR [N II]205 μm EMISSION IN A z=6.4 QUASAR HOST GALAXY

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 691, 期 1, 页码 L1-L4

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/691/1/L1

关键词

cosmology: observations; galaxies: active; galaxies: formation; galaxies: high-redshift; galaxies: starburst; radio lines: galaxies

资金

  1. NASA through Hubble Fellowship [HST-HF-01212.01-A]
  2. Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  3. Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung through the Max-Planck-Forschungspreis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a sensitive search for the P-3(1) -> P-3(0) ground-state fine structure line at 205 mu m of ionized nitrogen ([N II](205 mu m)) in one of the highest-redshift quasars (J1148+5251 at z = 6.42) using the IRAM 30 m telescope. The line is not detected at a (3 sigma) depth of 0.47 Jy km s(-1), corresponding to a [N II](205 mu m) luminosity limit of L-[N II] < 4.0 x 10(8) L-circle dot and a L-[N II]/L-FIR ratio of < 2 x 10(-5). In parallel, we have observed the CO (J = 6-5) line in J1148+5251, which is detected at a flux level consistent with earlier interferometric observations. Using our earlier measurements of the [C II](158 mu m) line strength, we derive an upper limit for the [N II](205 mu m)/[C II] line luminosity ratio of similar to 1/10 in J1148+5251. Our upper limit for the [C II]/[N II](205 mu m) ratio is similar to the value found for our Galaxy and M 82 (the only extragalactic system where the [N II](205 mu m) line has been detected to date). Given the non-detection of the [N II](205 mu m) line we can only speculate whether or not high-z detections are within reach of currently operating observatories. However, [N II](205 mu m) and other fine-structure lines will play a critical role in characterizing the interstellar medium at the highest redshifts (z > 7) using the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array, for which the highly excited rotational transitions of CO will be shifted outside the accessible (sub-)millimeter bands.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据