4.7 Article

A DISK OF YOUNG STARS AT THE GALACTIC CENTER AS DETERMINED BY INDIVIDUAL STELLAR ORBITS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 690, 期 2, 页码 1463-1487

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1463

关键词

black hole physics; Galaxy: center; infrared: stars; techniques: high angular resolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present new proper motions from the 10 m Keck telescopes for a puzzling population of massive, young stars located within 3 ''.5 (0.14 pc) of the supermassive black hole at the Galactic center. Our proper motion measurements have uncertainties of only 0.07 mas yr(-1) ( 3 km s(-1)), which is greater than or similar to 7 times better than previous proper motion measurements for these stars, and enables us to measure accelerations as low as 0.2 mas yr(-2) (7 km s(-1) yr(-1)). Using these measurements, line-of-sight velocities from the literature, and three-dimensional velocities for additional young stars in the central parsec, we constrain the true orbit of each individual star and directly test the hypothesis that the massive stars reside in two stellar disks as has been previously proposed. Analysis of the stellar orbits reveals only one of the previously proposed disks of young stars using a method that is capable of detecting disks containing at least seven stars. The detected disk contains 50% of the young stars, is inclined by similar to 115 degrees from the plane of the sky, and is oriented at a position angle of similar to 100 degrees east of north. Additionally, the on-disk and off-disk populations have similar K-band luminosity functions and radial distributions that decrease at larger radii as. proportional to r(-2). The disk has an out-of-the-disk velocity dispersion of 28 +/- 6 km s(-1), which corresponds to a half-opening angle of 7 degrees +/- 2 degrees, and several candidate disk members have eccentricities greater than 0.2. Our findings suggest that the young stars may have formed in situ but in a more complex geometry than a simple, thin circular disk.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据