4.7 Article

IMPROVED AGE ESTIMATION FOR SOLAR-TYPE DWARFS USING ACTIVITY-ROTATION DIAGNOSTICS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 687, 期 2, 页码 1264-1293

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/591785

关键词

stars: activity; stars: chromospheres; stars: coronae; stars: fundamental parameters; stars: rotation; X-rays: stars

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While the strong anticorrelation between chromospheric activity and age has led to the common use of the Ca II H and K emission index (R-HK' = L-IIK/L-bol) as an empirical age estimator for solar-type dwarfs, existing activity-age relations produce implausible ages at both high and low activity levels. We have compiled R-HK' data from the literature for young stellar clusters, richly populating for the first time the young end of the activity-age relation. Combining the cluster activity data with modern cluster age estimates and analyzing the color dependence of the chromospheric activity age index, we derive an improved activity-age calibration for F7-K2 dwarfs (0.5 mag < B V < 0.9 mag). We also present a more fundamentally motivated activity-age calibration that relies on conversion of R-HK' values through the Rossby number to rotation periods and then makes use of improved gyrochronology relations. We demonstrate that our new activity-age calibration has typical age precision of similar to 0.2 dex for normal solar-type dwarfs aged between the Hyades and the Sun (similar to 0.6-4.5 Gyr). Inferring ages through activity-rotation- age relations accounts for some color-dependent effects and systematically improves the age estimates (albeit only slightly). We demonstrate that coronal activity as measured through the fractional X-ray luminosity (R-X = L-X/L-bol) has nearly the same age- and rotation-inferring capability as chromospheric activity measured through R-HK'. As a first application of our calibrations, we provide new activity-derived age estimates for a volume-limited sample of the 108 solar-type field dwarfs within 16 pc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据