4.7 Article

Treatment of chronic painful diabetic neuropathy with isosorbide dinitrate spray

期刊

DIABETES CARE
卷 25, 期 10, 页码 1699-1703

出版社

AMER DIABETES ASSOC
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.10.1699

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE - Considerable evidence implicates impaired nitric oxide (NO) generation in the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathic pain. We therefore conducted a pilot study to examine the effects of isosorbide dinitrate(ISDN),a NO donor with local vasodilating properties,in spray form in the management of chronic neuropathic pain. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - The study was of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, and two-period cross-over design. After a 2-week run-in period, 22 diabetic patients (13 men, 20 with type 2 diabetes, age [mean +/- SE] 63.7 +/- 1.8 years, duration of diabetes 9.1 +/- 1.5 years, duration of painful neuropathy 2.6 +/- 0.4 years) were randomized, to receive ISDN or placebo sprays for 4 weeks, exchanging their treatment for a further 4 weeks after a 2-week wash-out period. The patients administered the spray to both feet before bedtime. Biweekly pain and other sensory symptoms were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Lickert scale, respectively. RESULTS - ISDN spray reduced overall neuropathic pain (P = 0.02) and burning sensation (P = 0.006). No treatment difference was observed with other sensory modalities (hot/cold sensation, tingling, numbness, hyperesthesia, and jabbing-like sensation). At study completion, 11 patients (50%) reported benefit and wished to continue using the ISDN spray, 4 (18%) preferred the placebo spray, and the remaining 7 (32%) were undecided. CONCLUSIONS - ISDN spray offers an alternative and effective pharmacological option in relieving overall pain and burning sensation in the management of painful diabetic neuropathy. The potential of ISDN spray in alleviating other specific sensory symptoms associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy merits further study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据