4.7 Article

The origin of dwarf ellipticals in the virgo cluster

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 674, 期 2, 页码 742-767

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/525513

关键词

galaxies : clusters : individual (Virgo); galaxies : interactions; ultraviolet : galaxies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the evolution of dwarf (L-H < 10(9.6) L-H circle dot) star-forming and quiescent galaxies in the Virgo Cluster by comparing their UV to radio centimetric properties to the predictions of multizone chemospectrophotometric models of galaxy evolution especially tuned to take into account the perturbations induced by the interaction with the cluster intergalactic medium. Our models simulate one or multiple ram pressure stripping events and galaxy starvation. Models predict that all star-forming dwarf galaxies entering the cluster for the first time loose most, if not all, of their atomic gas content, quenching on short timescales (<= 150 Myr) their activity of star formation. These dwarf galaxies soon become red and quiescent, gas metal-rich objects with spectrophotometric and structural properties similar to those of dwarf ellipticals. Young, low-luminosity, high surface brightness star-forming galaxies such as late-type spirals and BCDs are probably the progenitors of relatively massive dwarf ellipticals, while it is likely that low surface brightness Magellanic irregulars evolve into very low surface brightness quiescent objects hardly detectable in ground-based imaging surveys. The small number of dwarf galaxies with physical properties intermediate between those of star-forming and quiescent systems is consistent with a rapid (< 1 Gyr) transitional phase between the two dwarf galaxy populations. These results, combined with statistical considerations, are consistent with the idea that most of the dwarf ellipticals dominating the faint end of the Virgo luminosity function were initially star-forming systems, accreted by the cluster and stripped of their gas by one or subsequent ram pressure stripping events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据