4.7 Article

THE DISTRIBUTION, EXCITATION, AND FORMATION OF COMETARY MOLECULES: METHANOL, METHYL CYANIDE, AND ETHYLENE GLYCOL

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 689, 期 1, 页码 613-621

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/592242

关键词

astrobiology; comets: individual (Hale Bopp [C/1995 01], LINEAR [C/2002 T7]); molecular processes; radio lines: solar system; techniques: interferometric

资金

  1. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0838258] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  2. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [0838258] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present an interferometric and single-dish study of small organic species toward Comets C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp) and C/2002 T7 (LINEAR) using the BIMA interferometer at 3 mm and the ARO 12 m telescope at 2 mm. For Comet Hale-Bopp, both the single-dish and interferometer observations of CH3OH indicate an excitation temperature of 105 +/- 5 K and an average production rate ratio Q(CH3OH)/Q(H2O) similar to 1.3% at similar to 1 AU. In addition, the aperture synthesis observations of CH3OH suggest a distribution well described by a spherical outflow and no evidence of significant extended emission. Single-dish observations of CH3CN in Comet Hale-Bopp indicate an excitation temperature of 200 +/- 10 K and a production rate ratio of Q(CH3CN)/Q(H2O) similar to 0.017% at similar to 1 AU. The nondetection of a previously claimed transition of cometary (CH2OH)(2) toward Comet Hale-Bopp with the 12 m telescope indicates a compact distribution of emission, D < 9 '' (< 8500 km). For the single-dish observations of Comet T7 LINEAR, we find an excitation temperature of CH3OH of 35 +/- 5 K and a CH3OH production rate ratio of Q(CH3OH)/Q(H2O) similar to 1.5% at similar to 0.3 AU. Our data support current chemical models that CH3OH, CH3CN, and (CH2OH)(2) are parent nuclear species distributed into the coma via direct sublimation off cometary ices from the nucleus with no evidence of significant production in the outer coma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据