4.7 Article

THE VISUAL ORBIT OF THE 1.1 DAY SPECTROSCOPIC BINARY sigma(2) CORONAE BOREALIS FROM INTERFEROMETRY AT THE CHARA ARRAY

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 690, 期 1, 页码 394-406

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/394

关键词

binaries: spectroscopic; stars: fundamental parameters; stars: individual (sigma(2) Coronae Borealis); techniques: interferometric

资金

  1. College of Arts and Sciences at Georgia State University
  2. National Science Foundation (NSF) [AST-0606958, AST-0708229]
  3. NASA [BLF5704]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present an updated spectroscopic orbit and a new visual orbit for the double-lined spectroscopic binary sigma(2) Coronae Borealis (CrB) based on radial velocity measurements at the Oak Ridge Observatory in Harvard, MA and interferometric visibility measurements at the Center for High Angular Resolution Astronomy (CHARA) Array on Mount Wilson in California. sigma(2) CrB is composed of two Sun-like stars of roughly equal mass in a circularized orbit with a period of 1.14 days. The long baselines of the CHARA Array have allowed us to resolve the visual orbit for this pair, the shortest-period binary yet resolved interferometrically, enabling us to determine component masses of 1.137 +/- 0.037 M-circle dot and 1.090 +/- 0.036 M-circle dot. We have also estimated absolute V-band magnitudes of M-V(primary) = 4.35 +/- 0.02 and M-V(secondary) = 4.74 +/- 0.02. A comparison with stellar evolution models indicates a relatively young age of 0.1-3 Gyr, consistent with the high-Li abundance measured previously. This pair is the central component of a quintuple system, along with another similar-mass star, sigma(1) CrB, in a similar to 730-year visual orbit, and a distant M-dwarf binary, sigma CrB C, at a projected separation of similar to 10'. We also present differential proper motion evidence to show that components C & D ( ADS 9979C & D) listed for this system in the Washington Double Star Catalog are optical alignments that are not gravitationally bound to the sigma CrB system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据