4.7 Article

Modulation of the expression of p16INK4a and p14ARF by hnRNP A1 and A2 RNA binding proteins:: Implications for cellular senescence

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 193, 期 1, 页码 19-25

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.10147

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR03060, RR08168] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [1R03AG15603] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [2S06GM08168] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellular senescence is a terminal growth phase characteristic of normal human diploid fibroblasts. Altered gene expression during cellular senescence is numerous compared to that of younger proliferative cells in culture. We have previously reported that the levels and activities of hnRNP A1 and A2 RNA binding proteins are decreased in senescent human fibroblasts. Both proteins are multifunctional and may influence the expression of mRNA isoforms during development. In this study, we tested whether overexpression of either protein could modulate the mRNA isoforms of the INK4a locus, specifically p14(ARF) and p16(INK4a). Both INK4a mRNA isoforms have been shown to be growth suppressors and deletions of this locus allow cells to escape cellular senescence. We have found that increasing the ratio of either hnRNP A1 or A2 over that of splicing factor SF2/ASF results in the preferential generation of the p14(ARF) isoform. Overexpression of A1 or A2 RNA binding proteins also appear to increase the steady state mRNA levels of both isoforms, suggesting that in addition to alternative splicing, A1 and A2 may effect p14(ARF) and p16(INK4a) mRNA stability. A constitutive decrease in the ratio of hnRNP A1 or A2 to SF2/ASF in senescent fibroblasts is typically accompanied by an increase in the level of p16(INK4a) isoform. Our studies suggest that hnRNP A1 and A2 may exert an important role during replicative senescence by altering expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins through mRNA metabolism. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据