4.7 Article

REDSHIFTED ABSORPTION AT He I λ10830 AS A PROBE OF THE ACCRETION GEOMETRY OF T TAURI STARS

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 687, 期 2, 页码 1117-1144

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/591902

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; planetary systems: protoplanetary disks; scattering; stars: formation; stars: pre-main-sequence

资金

  1. NASA [NNG506GE47G]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We probe the geometry of magnetospheric accretion in classical T Tauri stars (CTTSs) by modeling red absorption at He I lambda 10830 via scattering of the stellar and veiling continua. Under the assumptions that the accretion flow is an azimuthally symmetric dipole and helium is sufficiently optically thick that all incident 1 mu m radiation is scattered, we illustrate the sensitivity of He I lambda 10830 red absorption to both the size of the magnetosphere and the filling factor of the hot accretion shock. We compare model profiles to those observed in 21 CTTSs with subcontinuum redshifted absorption at He I lambda 10830 and find that about half of the stars have red absorption and 1 mu m veilings that are consistent with dipole flows of moderate width with accretion shock filling factors matching the size of the magnetospheric footpoints. However, the remaining 50% of the profiles, with a combination of broad, deep absorption and low 1 mu m veiling, require very wide flows where magnetic footpoints are distributed over 10%-20% of the stellar surface but accretion shock filling factors are < 1%. We model these profiles by invoking large magnetospheres dilutely filled with accreting gas, leaving the disk over a range of radii in many narrow streamlets'' that fill only a small fraction of the entire infall region. In some cases accreting streamlets need to originate in the disk between several R-* and at least the corotation radius. A few stars have such deep absorption at velocities >0.5V(esc) that flows near the star with less curvature than a dipole trajectory seem to be required.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据