4.7 Article

A PLANETARY NEBULA AROUND NOVA V458 VULPECULAE UNDERGOING FLASH IONIZATION

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 688, 期 1, 页码 L21-L24

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/594366

关键词

ISM: abundances; novae, cataclysmic variables

资金

  1. INT Photometric Ha Survey of the Northern Galactic Plane (IPHAS)
  2. Isaac Newton Telescope at La Palma Observatory
  3. IPHAS
  4. Cambridge Astronomical Survey Unit
  5. Institute of Astronomy in Cambridge
  6. STFC
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council [PP/D005914/1, PP/C002229/1, ST/F001967/1, ST/F003196/1, PP/D001013/1, ST/F002599/1, ST/F005245/1, PP/D00148X/1, PP/E001149/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. STFC [ST/H002391/1, ST/F002599/1, PP/E001149/1, PP/C002229/1, PP/D005914/1, ST/F003196/1, ST/H004157/1, ST/F005245/1, ST/H004165/1, PP/D001013/1, ST/F001967/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nova V458 Vul erupted on 2007 August 8 and reached a visual magnitude of 8.1 a few days later. Ha images obtained 6 weeks before the outburst as part of the IPHAS Galactic plane survey reveal an 18th magnitude progenitor surrounded by an extended nebula. Subsequent images and spectroscopy of the nebula reveal an inner nebular knot increasing rapidly in brightness due to flash ionization by the nova event. We derive a distance of 13 kpc based on light travel time considerations, which is supported by two other distance estimation methods. The nebula has an ionized mass of 0.2 M(circle dot) and a low expansion velocity: this rules it out as ejecta from a, previous nova eruption, and is consistent with it being a similar to 14,000 year old planetary nebula, probably the product of a prior common envelope (CE) phase of evolution of the binary system. The large derived distance means that the mass of the erupting WD component of the binary is high. We identify two possible evolutionary scenarios, in at least one of which the system is massive enough to produce a Type Ia supernova upon merging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据