4.7 Article

EFFECTS OF RADIONUCLIDES ON THE IONIZATION STATE OF PROTOPLANETARY DISKS AND DENSE CLOUD CORES

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 690, 期 1, 页码 69-81

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/690/1/69

关键词

cosmic rays; ISM: magnetic fields; planetary systems: formation; planetary systems: protoplanetary disks; solar system: formation; stars: formation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We comprehensively reinvestigate the ionization rates by radionuclides with the newest data on the abundance of the nuclides for the primitive solar nebula distinguishing the ionization rates of a hydrogen molecule, zeta(H2), from those of a helium atom zeta(He) approximate to 0.84 zeta(H2). The ionization rates by Th-232, U-235, and U-238 become an order of magnitude larger than in the previous work of Umebayashi & Nakano by including all the energy released in the decay series, and these nuclides contribute about 20% of the total ionization rate by the long-lived radionuclides, 1.4 x 10(-22) s(-1) for a hydrogen molecule. The rest (80%) is contributed by K-40. Among the short-lived radionuclides which are extinct in the present solar system, Al-26 is the dominant ionization source with the rate (7-10) x 10(-19) s(-1), overwhelming the long-lived nuclides. In addition, Fe-60 and Cl-36 are more efficient than the long-lived nuclides though at least 10 times more inefficient than Al-26. The helium abundance in the primitive solar nebula is significantly lower than in the present interstellar medium. We obtain a simple formula which transforms the ionization rates into those for the other values of the helium abundance. Ionization by radionuclides is quite inefficient when the mean dust size is greater than about 1 cm. Using these ionization rates, we investigate the ionization state for some configurations of the clouds. With an improved attenuation law of cosmic rays in geometrically thin disks, we find that the dead zones in protoplanetary disks are significantly larger than those obtained in the previous work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据