4.7 Article

Evidence for a nonuniversal stellar initial mass function from the integrated properties of SDSS galaxies

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 675, 期 1, 页码 163-187

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/524095

关键词

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : stellar content; stars : luminosity function, mass function

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper revisits the classical Kennicutt method for inferring the stellar IMF from the integrated light properties of galaxies. The large-size, uniform high-quality data set from the SDSS DR4 is combined with more in-depth modeling and quantitative statistical analysis to search for systematic IMF variations as a function of galaxy luminosity. Galaxy H alpha equivalent widths are compared to a broadband color index to constrain the IMF. This parameter space is useful for breaking degeneracies that are traditionally problematic. Age and dust corrections are largely orthogonal to IMF variations. In addition, the effects of metallicity and smooth SFH e-folding times are small compared to IMF variations. We find that for the sample as a whole the best-fitting IMF slope above 0.5 M-circle dot is Gamma = 1.4535, with a negligible random error of +/- 0.0004 and a systematic error of +/- 0.1. Galaxies brighter than around M-r,M-0.1 = -20 ( including galaxies like the Milky Way, which has M-r,M-0.1 similar to -21) are well fitted by a universal Gamma similar to 1.4 IMF, similar to Salpeter, and smooth, exponential SFHs. Fainter galaxies prefer steeper IMFs, and the quality of the fits reveals that for these galaxies a universal IMF with smooth SFHs is actually a poor assumption. Several sources of sample bias are ruled out as the cause of these luminosity-dependent IMF variations. Analysis of bursting SFH models shows that an implausible coordination of burst times is required to fit a universal IMF to the M-r,M-0.1 = -17 galaxies. This leads to the conclusions that the IMF in low-luminosity galaxies has fewer massive stars, by either steeper slope or lower upper mass cutoff, and is not universal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据