4.7 Article

Cosmic evolution of stellar disk truncations:: From z ∼ 1 to the local universe

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 684, 期 2, 页码 1026-1047

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/590142

关键词

galaxies : evolution; galaxies : fundamental parameters; galaxies : high-redshift; galaxies : structure

资金

  1. NASA [NAS5-26555]
  2. Spanish Ministry of Education and Science [AYA2004-08251-C02-01, AYA2007-67625-C02-01]
  3. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias [P3/86]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have conducted the largest systematic search so far for stellar disk truncations in disklike galaxies at intermediate redshift (z < 1.1), using the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey-South (GOODS-S) data from theHubble Space Telescope ACS. Focusing on type II galaxies (i.e., downbending profiles), we explore whether the position of the break in the rest-frame B-band radial surface brightness profile ( a direct estimator of the extent of the disk where most of the massive star formation is taking place) evolves with time. The number of galaxies under analysis (238 of a total of 505) is an order of magnitude larger than in previous studies. For the first time, we probe the evolution of the break radius for a given stellar mass ( a parameter well suited to address evolutionary studies). Our results suggest that, for a given stellar mass, the radial position of the break has increased with cosmic time by a factor of 1.3 +/- 0.1 between z similar to 1 and similar to 0. This is in agreement with a moderate inside-out growth of the disk galaxies in the last similar to 8 Gyr. In the same period of time, the surface brightness level in the rest-frame B band at which the break takes place has increased by 3.3 +/- 0.2 mag arcsec(-2) ( a decrease in brightness by a factor of 20.9 +/- 4.2). We have explored the distribution of the scale lengths of the disks in the region inside the break and how this parameter relates to the break radius. We also present results of the statistical analysis of profiles of artificial galaxies, to assess the reliability of our results.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据