4.8 Article

Fas enhances fibrogenesis in the bile duct ligated mouse: A link between apoptosis and fibrosis

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 123, 期 4, 页码 1323-1330

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO
DOI: 10.1053/gast.2002.35953

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK41876] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & Aims: Hepatocyte apoptosis and fibrosis are both features of liver injury. However, the potential mechanistic link between these 2 processes remains obscure. Our aim was to ascertain if Fas-mediated hepatocyte apoptosis promotes liver fibrogenesis during extrahepatic cholestasis. Methods: Wild-type and Fas-deficient lymphoproliferation (lpr) mice underwent bile duct ligation. Liver injury was assessed by quantitating hepatocyte apoptosis with the terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay and determining serum ALT values. mRNA expression was quantitated using real-time polymerase chain reaction technology. Liver fibrosis was assessed by digital image analysis of Sirius red-stained sections. Results: In 3-day bile duct ligated (BDL) animals, TUNEL-positive hepatocytes and serum ALT values were reduced in lpr versus wildtype animals. Likewise, hepatic mRNA transcripts for alpha-smooth muscle actin and platelet-derived growth factor receptor-beta (initiation phase of stellate cell activation) and transforming growth factor beta1 mRNA, collagen 1alpha, and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases (perpetuation phase of stellate cell activation) were also reduced in 3-day BDL wild-type mice compared with lpr mice. Finally, in 3-week BDL mice, immunoreactivity for alpha-smooth muscle actin and Sirius red staining for collagen were significantly less in lpr compared with wildtype animals. Conclusion: Fas-mediated hepatocyte injury is mechanistically linked to liver fibrogenesis. These observations suggest that inhibition of Fas-mediated apoptosis may be a therapeutic antifibrogenic strategy in cholestatic liver diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据