4.7 Article

Virulent but not avirulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis can evade the growth inhibitory action of a T helper 1-dependent, nitric oxide synthase 2-independent defense in mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE
卷 196, 期 7, 页码 991-998

出版社

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1084/jem.20021186

关键词

M. tuberculosis; virulence; NOS2 synthase; NADPH-oxidase; Th1 immunity

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-64565] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI037844, AI-37844] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Control of infection with virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) in mice is dependent on the generation of T helper (Th)1-mediated immunity that serves, via secretion of interferon (IFN)-gamma and other cytokines, to upregulate the antimycobacterial function of macrophages of which the synthesis of inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS)2 is an essential event. As a means to understanding the basis of Mtb virulence, the ability of gene-deleted mice incapable of making NOS2 (NCS2(-/-)), gp91(Phox) subunit of the respiratory burst NADPH-oxidase complex (Phox(-/-)), or either enzyme (NOS2/Phox(-/-)), to control airborne infection with the avirulent R1Rv and H37Ra strains of Mtb was compared with their ability control infection with the virulent H37Rv strain. NOS2(-/-), Phox-/-, and NOS2/Phox(-/-) mice showed no deficiency in ability to control infection with either strain of avirulent Mtb. By contrast, NOS2(-/-) mice, but not Phox(-/-) mice, were incapable of controlling H37Rv infection and died early from neutrophil-dominated lung pathology. Control of infection with avirulent, as well as virulent Mtb, depended on the synthesis of IFN-gamma, and was associated with a substantial increase in the synthesis in the lungs of mRNA for IFN-gamma and NOS2, and with production of NOS2 by macrophages at sites of infection. The results indicate that virulent, but not avirulent, Mtb can overcome the growth inhibitory action of a Th1-dependent, NOS2-independent mechanism of defense.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据