4.8 Article

Inhibition of intestinal cholesterol absorption by ezetimibe in humans

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 106, 期 15, 页码 1943-1948

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000034044.95911.DC

关键词

ezetimibe; cholesterol absorption; cholesterol synthesis; lathosterol; plant sterols

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-Ezetimibe has been shown to inhibit cholesterol absorption in animal models, but studies on cholesterol absorption in humans have not been performed thus far. Methods and Results-The effect of ezetimibe (10 mg/d) on cholesterol absorption and synthesis, sterol excretion, and plasma concentrations of cholesterol and noncholesterol sterols was investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in 18 patients with mild to moderate hypercholesterolemia. Treatment periods lasted 2 weeks with an intervening 2-week washout period. Fractional cholesterol absorption rates averaged 49.8+/-13.8% on placebo and 22.7+/-25.8% on ezetimibe, indicating a reduction of 54% (geometric mean ratio; P<0.001). Cholesterol synthesis increased by 89% from 931+/-1027 mg/d on placebo to 1763 1098 mg/d on ezetimibe (P<0.001), while the ratio of lathosterol-to-cholesterol, an indirect marker of cholesterol synthesis, was increased by 72% (P<0.001). Bile acid synthesis was insignificantly increased (placebo: 264+/-209 mg/d, ezetimibe: 308+/-184 mg/d; P=0.068). Mean percent changes from baseline for LDL and total cholesterol after ezetimibe treatment were -20.4% and -15.1%, respectively (P<0.001 for both), Whereas campesterol and sitosterol were decreased by -48% and -41%, respectively. Conclusion-In humans, ezetimibe inhibits cholesterol absorption and promotes a compensatory increase of cholesterol synthesis, followed by clinically relevant reductions in LDL and total cholesterol concentrations. Ezetimibe also reduces plasma concentrations of the noncholesterol sterols sitosterol and campesterol, suggesting an effect on. the absorption of these compounds as well.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据