4.7 Article

A FULL YEAR'S CHANDRA EXPOSURE ON SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY QUASARS FROM THE CHANDRA MULTIWAVELENGTH PROJECT

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 690, 期 1, 页码 644-669

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/1/644

关键词

galaxies: active; quasars: absorption lines; quasars: general; surveys; X-rays: general

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the spectral energy distributions and evolution of a large sample of optically selected quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey that were observed in 323 Chandra images analyzed by the Chandra Multiwavelength Project. Our highest-confidence matched sample includes 1135 X-ray detected quasars in the redshift range 0.2 < z < 5.4, representing some 36 Msec of effective exposure. We provide catalogs of QSO properties, and describe our novel method of calculating X-ray flux upper limits and effective sky coverage. Spectroscopic redshifts are available for about 1/3 of the detected sample; elsewhere, redshifts are estimated photometrically. We detect 56 QSOs with redshift z > 3, substantially expanding the known sample. We find no evidence for evolution out to z similar to 5 for either the X-ray photon index Gamma or for the ratio of optical/UV to X-ray flux alpha(ox). About 10% of detected QSOs show best-fit intrinsic absorbing columns greater than 10(22) cm(-2), but the fraction might reach similar to 1/3 if most nondetections are absorbed. We confirm a significant correlation between alpha(ox) and optical luminosity, but it flattens or disappears for fainter (M-B greater than or similar to -23) active galactic nucleus (AGN) alone. We report significant hardening of Gamma both toward higher X-ray luminosity, and for relatively X-ray loud quasars. These trends may represent a relative increase in nonthermal X-ray emission, and our findings thereby strengthen analogies between Galactic black hole binaries and AGN. For uniformly selected subsamples of narrow-line Seyfert 1s and narrow absorption line QSOs, we find no evidence for unusual distributions of either alpha(ox) or Gamma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据