4.8 Article

A ubiquitin-proteasome pathway represses the Drosophila immune deficiency signaling cascade

期刊

CURRENT BIOLOGY
卷 12, 期 20, 页码 1728-1737

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(02)01214-9

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The inducible production of antimicrobial peptides is a major immune response in Drosophila. The genes encoding these peptides are activated by NF-kappaB transcription factors that are controlled by two independent signaling cascades: the Toll pathway that regulates the NF-kappaB homologs, Dorsal and DIF; and the IMD pathway that regulates the compound NF-kappaB-like protein, Relish. Although numerous components of each pathway that are required to induce antimicrobial gene expression have been identified, less is known about the mechanisms that either repress antimicrobial genes in the absence of infection or that downregulate these genes after infection. Results: In a screen for factors that negatively regulate the IMD pathway, we isolated two partial loss-of-function mutations in the SkpA gene that constitutively induce the antibacterial peptide gene, Diptericin, a target of the IMD pathway. These mutations do not affect the systemic expression of the antifungal peptide gene, Drosomycin, a target of the Toll pathway. SkpA encodes a homolog of the yeast and human Skp1 proteins. Skp1 proteins function as subunits of SCF-E3 ubiquitin ligases that target substrates to the 26S proteasome, and mutations affecting either the Drosophila SCIF components, Slimb and dCullin1, or the proteasome also induce Diptericin expression. In cultured cells, inhibition of SkpA and Slimb via RNAi increases levels of both the full-length Relish protein and the processed Rel-homology domain. Conclusions: In contrast to other NF-kappaB activation pathways, the Drosophila I M D pathway is repressed by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. A possible target of this proteolytic activity is the Relish transcription factor, suggesting a mechanism for NF-kappaB downregulation in Drosophila.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据