4.6 Review

Heme oxygenase-1 system in organ transplantation

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 74, 期 7, 页码 905-912

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200210150-00001

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [R01 AI42223, AI23847] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) system, the rate-limiting step in the conversion of heme, is among the most critical of cytoprotective mechanisms activated during cellular stress: The cytoprotection may result from the elimination of heme and the function of HO-1 downstream mediators, that is, biliverdin, carbon monoxide, and free iron. HO-1 overexpression exerts beneficial effects in a number of transplantation models, including antigen-independent ischemia/reperfusion injury, acute and chronic allograft rejection, and xenotransplantation. The HO-1 system is thought to exert four major functions: (1) antioxidant function; (2) maintenance of microcirculation; (3) modulatory function upon the cell cycle; and (4) anti-inflammatory. function. The antioxidant function depends on heme degradation, oxygen consumption, biliverdin, and production of ferritin via iron accumulation. The production of carbon monoxide, which has vasodilation and antiplatelet aggregation properties, maintains tissue microcirculation and may be instrumental in antiapoptotic and cell arrest mechanisms. Heme catabolism and HO-1 overexpression exert profound direct and indirect inhibitory effects on the cascade of host inflammatory responses mediated by neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes. These anti-inflammatory properties result in cytoprotection in a broad spectrum of graft injury experimental models, including ischemia/reperfusion, acute and chronic allograft, and xenotransplant rejection. Further, the multifaceted targets of HO-1-mediated cytoprotection may simultaneously benefit both local graft. function and host systemic immune responses. Thus, the HO-1 system serves as a novel therapeutic concept in organ transplantation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据