4.7 Article

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis is associated with deficiencies of cellular cytolysis but normal expression of transcripts relevant to killer-cell-induced apoptosis

期刊

BLOOD
卷 100, 期 8, 页码 2891-2898

出版社

AMER SOC HEMATOLOGY
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2001-12-0260

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In 65 patients with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), we found an as yet undescribed heterogeneity of defects in cellular cytotoxicity when assay conditions were modified by the incubation time, the presence of mitogen, or interleukin-2 (IL-2). The standard 4-hour natural killer (INK) test against K562 targets was negative in all patients. In patients deficient in type 1 (n=21), type 2 (n=5), and type 4 (n=8) HLH, negative INK function could be reconstituted by mitogen, by IL-2, or by prolongation of the incubation time (16 hours), respectively. Most patients (n=31) displayed the type 3 defect, defined by a lack of any cellular cytotoxicity independent of assay variations. The characteristic hypercytokinemia also concerned counterregulatory cytokines, such as proinflammatory interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), simultaneously elevated with suppressive IL-10 in 38% of types 1-, 2-, and 4-deficient patients and in 71% of type 3-deficient patients. Elevated IFN-gamma alone correlated with high liver enzymes, but sCD95-ligand and sCD25 did not-though these markers were expected to indicate the extent of histiocytic organ infiltration. Outcome analysis revealed more deaths in patients with type 3 deficiency (P=.017). Molecular defects were associated with homozygously mutated perforin only in 4 patients, but other type 3 patients expressed normal transcripts of effector molecules for target-cell apoptosis, including perforin and granzyme family members, as demonstrated by RNase protection analysis. Thus, target-cell recognition or differentiation defects are likely to explain this severe phenotype in HLH. Hyperactive phagocytes combined with INK defects may imply defects on the level of the antigen-presenting cell.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据